Simple Question
When has a cease fire ever really worked?
I don't have a lot of time. Football season has started for my son so I leave the house at 6:00 am and don't get home until after 8:00, hence, my lack of posting lately. I do apologize for slacking but hey, I'm a dad first.
But would somebody please tell me when a cease fire has actually worked? All these calls for a cease fire between the Hezbos and Israel, and someone please tell me, what good will it do?
Work with me here for a second. We had a cease fire in the Korean War, but how has that turned out? North Korea can't feed themselves, they live in absolute poverty, and their head of state is a lunatic with nuclear capabilities. Sure, South Korea is doing fairly well. But have you ever been to the beach in South Korea? No, you haven't. You know why? Because it is filled with landmines just in case North Korea decides to conduct an amphibious assault. So, while there has been no actual fighting so to speak, you still don't have peace.
UPDATE: Korean Soldiers Exchange Fire Along Border Talk about strange. Last night as I was writing this post, North Korean soldiers took a couple of shots across the DMZ at some South Korean troops and the South Koreans fired back. No official word from North Korea as to what prompted the shots. Further proving my point that while there is a cease fire agreement between North and South Korea, tensions are still very high and there is no real peace.
How about all of the other cease fires between Israel and Palestine? How have they turned out? Not so good huh? Over the past 50 years of Israel's history, how many conflicts have there been? Always one more than the number of cease fires...
Here's a big one that nobody talks about and I can't believe I've not heard one political pundit mention this one. With my busy schedule, perhaps I've missed it, but how about the cease fire agreement with Saddam Hussein? What did that last? 12 years and a gazillion U.N. Resolutions? All that time and all those resolutions and what happened? He continued to defy the U.N. as well as the U.S. and we had to go kick his ass again. If we had done it right the first time and not bowed to the U.N.'s mandate of a "peaceful resolution," we would be out of there by now and Iraq would be going into their 15th year of freedom. Think about how the current war on terror would be now had we outted Hussein with overwhelming force 15 years ago.
What about the U.S. pulling out of Somalia like we did under President Clinton? We go in with our pants down, get a few soldiers killed and turn tail and run because Clinton is afraid of a Political Nightmare. This cowardice has been cited by bin Laden on several occasions as the reason he believes we are a paper tiger. This is what motivated him to carry out terrorist attacks against the U.S. including the 9/11 attacks. He believed and still believes the U.S. doesn't have the stomach for a serious conflict. And when I hear certain liberals in this country talk, they just prove him right. But wasn't pulling out of Somalia just another form of a cease fire?
These cease fires I've listed are all different forms of cease fires. And along with that, they are all different forms of appeasement. We appeased the bad guys by letting them remain in power and it always comes back to haunt us. Every single time. The French tried to appease Hitler and we all know how that turned out.
We have appeased North Korea and how's that going? Remember Jimmy Carter getting a Nobel Peace prize for his "agreed framework." You know, the deal that Carter and Maddy Albright made with North Korea that gave them food, medicine, and nuclear technology as long as they promised not to build nuclear weapons. How's that appeasement going? Not so good? Hmm...
The U.S. lead coalition, by direction of the U.N. allowed Hussein to remain in power and he laughed in their faces for over 12 years. It was made a little easier for him after paying many of them a lot of bribe money via Oil for Food, but hey why should we talk about that? A great deal of world leaders selling their vote on the security council? No, don't talk about that...
By the way, how are things going in Somalia? Somalia has been without an effective central government since 1991 and the warlords running the country basically turned on each other, carved much of the country into armed camps that are ruled by violence. And now Islamic fanatics are taking over much of the government. That's right boys and girls, al Qaida has a new home. So, not finishing the job there has really paid off. Don't ya think?
And still the U.N., and even we in the U.S., think a cease fire is the solution to the current Israel and Hezbo conflict. For the love of God people. Wake up. The Hezbos aren't interested in negotiating or any actual concessions. They have but one goal and that is to obliterate Israel. So, unless the U.N. wants to get rid of Israel, they really have nothing to offer the Hezbos that will make them stop.
Get it through your heads. Complete world domination is the goal of these Islamo Fascists. They will not stop until they are dead. Wake up for crying out loud. To hell with a cease fire. Un-leash the Iraeli army and let them take out the Hezbos once and for all.
Always remember this: The only true path to peace is through undeniable and overwhelming victory. Kind of like when we accepted the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of the Japanese. Have we lived in peace with Japan for 60 years? Yes. Have our two countries flourished since that surrender? Yes. Are we worried about the Japanese breaking out some Kamikaze pilots and attacking us again? No.
Victory works every time it's tried. So, really, all I am saying, is give victory a chance...


