Great Global Warming Swindle: Part VI & VII

I've been very busy, so here are parts 6 and 7 to make up for lost time...

Part 6 discusses the normalcy of ice separation and the reports of the possible threat of malaria spreading northward due to warming temps...

Video Removed by Youtube.com

Part 7, they discuss environmental policy and how it's being directed towards 3rd world nations, in effect limiting their ability to develop. Author Paul Dreissen: "The policies being pushed to supposedly prevent global warming are having a disastrous effect on the world's poorest people."

Video Removed by Youtube.com

Now, I don't know how much blame for preventing African Nations from creating cheap electricity we can actually put on the environmental movement, but watching that video, it pretty much makes me want to punch somebody in the brain. Anyone, who stands in front of these poor people, preventing from capitalizing on the natural resources that exist in Africa, really needs to be ashamed of themselves. We constantly hear from the left about the poor in Africa and we should be helping them. Well, it's always been my belief that the only cure for poverty is wealth. You produce wealth by harnessing a resource, developing that resource, and selling that resource. If the people of Africa are in fact being prevented from doing that in any way by the environmental movement, then those in charge of that movement should be in jail for fraud.

I don't know everything on this subject. I'm not a climate expert. I'm not a scientist. But what I do know is capitalism is the key to ending poverty. And I don't think anyone can deny that the man made global warming movement is being led by the anti-capitalists among us. The same people that supposedly care so much about the poor...

Care to dispute that? Dispute it in the Nightmare Forums

The Great Global Warming Swindle: Part V

Sorry I'm late, work has been nuts...

On we go. Today, they talk about how the fall of communism in the early 90's brings political activists and anti-capitalists to the environemental movement. They also start the discussion on the temperature prediction models...

Video Removed by Youtube.com

Have something to say about it? Say it in the Nightmare Forums

The Great Global Warming Swindle: Part IV

And, we're back...

Here comes the Sun, do do do do! In tonight's episode, they explore the relationship between solar activity and temperatures. Also, you'll learn who really brought global warming into politics. You'll be surprised. I know I was...

Video Removed by Youtube.com

I found that part about the sun and the temps very interesting.

Want to respond to what you've seen? Join me in the Nightmare Forums.

The Great Global Warming Swindle: Part III

So, where were we...

Oh yes, what Al Gore doesn't tell us in his movie. Which came first, the CO2 or the Heat?

Video Removed by Youtube.com

Humans are not the main source of CO2? Really? Funny, you don't hear that from the greeny weenies do you...

Let your voice be heard, in the Nightmare Forums.

The Great Global Warming Swindle: Part II

The Nightmare continues...

Part II in the series I'm posting this week.

In this episode, they discuss the supposed connection between industrial growth, increases of CO2, and the earth's temperatures. We learn about that CO2, the main cause of concern for man-made global warming only makes up .054% of all the green house gases and 95% of the make up of GHG's is water vapor.

Oh, and this interesting quote from Professor Frederick Singer, former Directer of the US National Weather Service: "The hypothesis of man-made global warming is falsified by the evidence." You really shouldn't miss this...

Video Removed by Youtube.com

And tomorrow, we'll learn what Al Gore isn't telling you...

You can discuss this in the Nightmare Forums.

The Great Global Warming Swindle: Part I

A Political Nightmare for a movement...

I will be posting one of these videos each day. I urge you to watch them and listen to what they have to say...

Video Removed by Youtube.com

Quite interesting, wouldn't you say?

Have a say here, in the Nightmare Forums

"The creation of a revolutionary worldwide Islamic state"

The former Jihadi said...

On this 4th of July, I started the day with a cup of coffee, looking forward to spending time with family and friends celebrating our Nation's Birthday. I opened up my laptop to what was happening in the world. I was in a really good mood until I stumbled onto this:

When I was still a member of what is probably best termed the British
Jihadi Network - a series of British Muslim terrorist groups linked by a single ideology - I remember how we used to laugh in celebration whenever people on TV proclaimed that the sole cause for Islamic acts of terror like 9/11, the Madrid bombings and 7/7 was Western foreign policy.

By blaming the Government for our actions, those who pushed this "Blair's bombs" line did our propaganda work for us.

More important, they also helped to draw away any critical examination from the real engine of our violence: Islamic theology.

Those are the words of former Islamic fanatic, Hassan Butt, writing in the Daily Mail. He left the Jihadi movement in February of 2006 when he "realised that its members had simply become mindless killers." Is there really any need for me to comment on this? I'll just let him continue...

But if I were still fighting for their cause, I'd be laughing once again.

Mohammed Sidique Khan met with the author on two separate occasions Mohammad Sidique Khan, the leader of the July 7 bombings, and I were both part of the network - I met him on two occasions.

And though many British extremists are angered by the deaths of fellow Muslim across the world, what drove me and many others to plot acts of extreme terror within Britain and abroad was a sense that we were fighting for the creation of a revolutionary worldwide Islamic state that would dispense Islamic justice.

Think about that. How many times have we been over this. Their goal is not to live in peace. Their goal is to convert you or kill you. And they feel completely justified in doing it. He continues...

The foundation of extremist reasoning rests upon a model of the world in which you are either a believer or an infidel.

Formal Islamic theology, unlike Christian theology, does not allow for the separation of state and religion: they are considered to be one and the same.

For centuries, the reasoning of Islamic jurists has set down rules of interaction between Dar ul-Islam (the Land of Islam) and Dar ul-Kufr (the Land of Unbelief) to cover almost every matter of trade, peace and war.

But what radicals and extremists do is to take this two steps further. Their first step has been to argue that, since there is no pure Islamic state, the whole world must be Dar ul-Kufr (The Land of Unbelief).

Ah, so we are all non-believers. Now pay close attention to this because this is important...

Step two: since Islam must declare war on unbelief, they have declared war upon the whole world.

Along with many of my former peers, I was taught by Pakistani and British radical preachers that this reclassification of the globe as a Land of War (Dar ul-Harb) allows any Muslim to destroy the sanctity of the five rights that every human is granted under Islam: life, wealth, land, mind and belief.

In Dar ul-Harb, anything goes, including the treachery and cowardice of attacking civilians.

But we have to afford them the protections of the Geneva Convention? Let me tell you something. You cannot fight these people with sensitivity. You will never stop these maniacs by trying to be civilized. You can give me this "we'll be no better than them" bullshit all you want, it isn't going to change the reality that these people are willing to glorify murdering innocent people in pursuit of their stated goal. And honestly, that's what separates us from them. Our motives, our goals, and our state of mind. We don't purposely target civilians. We aren't willing to cut the heads off of non-Christians. We actually desire peace. They desire death. That is what separates us. Not our tactics, but our intent.

No war has ever been won by doing just enough to win. You win wars by completely overwhelming your enemy. You win wars by making your enemy so miserable and so desperate to survive, they will surrender. You have to make them so miserable, that they actually change their mindset from that of willing to die to that of just seeking peace, to that of just wishing it was over. That's how you defeat them.

Those on the left that want to blame American foreign policy and George Bush had better wake up and smell reality. They hated us before we invaded Iraq. They wanted to kill us before George W. Bush was elected. They wanted to dominate the world long before any of this current mess started. And they aren't going to just stop coming after us if we leave Iraq. They do hate us for our freedoms. They do hate us for our way of life. Their stated goal is an Islamic world. And by definition, an Islamic world goes against every notion of freedom and our way of life. I can't imagine any better day than July 4th to think about that.

Happy Independence Day...

You can discuss this article in the Nightmare Forums